经内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤的疗效及安全性CSCD

目的探讨经内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤(RNET)的疗效,并评估其安全性。方法回顾性分析2011年1月—2017年12月在江苏省人民医院行直肠ESD治疗、经病理及免疫组织化学确诊为RNET的80例患者(91处病变)的临床资料,并对患者进行随访。结果所有病变均为完整切除病灶。有症状的患者术后3天~2月症状均有不同程度缓解,无严重术后并发症,标本切缘阳性率20.88%(19/91),切缘可疑阳性率35.16%(32/91)。切除标本最大长径20 mm。单因素分析中,肿瘤长径≥10 mm、肿瘤处于G2级与切缘可疑阳性及阳性相关(P<0.05)。肿瘤处于G2级为切缘可疑阳性及阳性的独立危险因素。仅有1例患者术前证实为RNET。中位随访时间34月,复发率4.40%(4/91)。结论ESD在治疗直径<20 mm的G1级和G2级的RNET患者中具有良好疗效。对于ESD术后显示切缘阳性及可疑阳性的RNET患者,可密切随访暂不实施其他治疗。     

Endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty: full thickness and partial thickness tragal graft

IntroductionCartilage is the grafting material of choice for certain disorders of the middle ear. The indications for its routine use remain controversial due to the possible detrimental effect on post-operative hearing.ObjectiveThe present study was carried out to report a personal experience with “tragal cartilage shield” tympanoplasty to compare the results, in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement, of endoscopic cartilage shield technique using either partial thickness or full thickness tragal cartilage for type 1 tympanoplasty and to highlight the tips for single-handed endoscopic ear surgery.MethodsFifty patients with safe chronic suppurative otitis media, assisted at out-patient department from February 2014 to September 2015 were selected. They were randomly allocated into two groups, 25 patients were included in group A where a full thickness tragal cartilage was used and 25 patients included in group B where a partial thickness tragal cartilage was used. Audiometry was performed 2 months after the surgery in all cases and the patients were followed for one year.ResultsOut of the total of 50 patients 39 (78%) had a successful graft take up, amongst these 22 belonged to group A and 17 belonged to the group B. The hearing improvement was similar in both groups.ConclusionThis study reveals that endoscopic tragal cartilage shield tympanoplasty is a reliable technique; with a high degree of graft take and good hearing results, irrespective of the thickness. Furthermore, the tragal cartilage is easily accessible, adaptable, resistant to resorption and single-handed endoscopic ear surgery is minimally invasive, sutureless and provides a panoramic view of the middle ear.     

Appropriate extent of surgery for aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

The current literature lacks strong guidelines regarding surgical management of patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), who present with the clinical triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), bronchial asthma, and aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intolerance. To further define the effectiveness of sinus surgery in treating AERD patients, this review article discusses current evidence regarding outcomes associated with more extensive surgery, the benefits of frontal sinus surgery on polyposis, and the role of Draf III intervention. Numerous studies suggest that Draf III frontal sinusotomy may be an efficacious early intervention due to increased neo-ostial patency and subsequent distribution of topical therapies. Future studies that further investigate the efficacy and safety of extensive surgery in AERD patients are warranted.     

局部复发鼻咽癌的外科挽救治疗CSCD

鼻咽癌放疗后约10%~36%的患者复发。复发病灶通常对放疗不敏感,再程放疗疗效不佳,且会导致严重并发症,而外科治疗可以根治性切除癌灶并避免二次照射,成为复发鼻咽癌理想的挽救治疗方法。鼻外入路挽救手术创伤较大,且均存在不同程度的手术并发症。经鼻内镜鼻咽切除术因微创、切除范围不亚于鼻外入路,逐步成为rT1~2及部分rT3期患者的首选方案,相应的外科分期为复发鼻咽癌的分层治疗提供了科学依据。颈内动脉栓塞术、颅内外血管搭桥术等新技术的运用正在扩大挽救手术适应证,但广泛的外科切除是否优于二程放疗仍需更多实践验证。